Get ready for some Adrenalin "RUSH"
Monday, May 27, 2013
Friday, February 15, 2013
Cloud Atlas (2012)
Cloud Atlas, based on a book by David Mitchell, brilliantly
interweaves six storylines with each character portraying multiple
reincarnations in an intricate plot structure, set in the past, present, and
future. Films of this type often struggle to include adequate character
development or fail to give equal significance to each storyline in the
overarching message. However, I believe that Cloud Atlas succeeds in this
aspect, as each character has depth and strong motives that dictates their
actions, each storyline builds in conflict followed by a satisfying conclusion,
and everything is subtly connected, as stated by the film’s tagline. The film
definitely leaves me pondering long afterwards, trying to trace each plot and individual
as well as their correlation to each other. Although Cloud Atlas lasts three
hours, I find it necessary, as the multi-layered story would have seemed rushed
or incomplete if the film were shortened.
Initially, the ideas may seem scattered, but have patience. As
the film progressed, I soon became deeply invested in each character’s
heartfelt journey, as the film ties together themes of love, identity, and
rebirth, strengthening my anticipation for what’s to come later in the film. The
first sign of cohesion came around thirty minutes into the film, and was deeply
touching, as Tom Hanks, Halle Berry, or Jim Broadbent express a feeling of
familiarity with absolute strangers or certain places through narration: “A
powerful déjà vu ran through my bones, as if I have been here before in another
life.”
I love how the actions scenes are overlapped at certain
moments, switching between two storylines in which Jim Sturgess and Doona Bae are
engaged in a high-speed chase on futuristic motorcycles or Tom Hanks and Halle Berry
are fighting off barbaric tribes deep in the forest. In addition, some of my
favorite scenes involve montages of their daily lives as one person narrates
over the scene in a way that relates to what each individual is experiencing.
During these montages, the nostalgic theme song, Cloud Atlas Sextet, drowns out
the background noises, evoking a sense of déjà vu as if an echo subconsciously
runs through each of them and connects them metaphysically. Ben Winshaw
remarks, “It’s a whole movement I wrote, imagining us meeting again and again
in different times, in different ages.” This concept is also conveyed visually through
shared surreal dreams as well as when everyone reveals mysterious, identical
birthmarks or scars, resembling a shooting star.
Tom Tykwer, Andy Wachowski, and Lana Wachowski excellently
synthesized these various plot elements into one big picture. One thing’s for
certain: Cloud Atlas deserves an Academy Award nomination for the effort put
into make up, depicting different, and sometimes unrecognizable, incarnations
of each character. Cloud Atlas invokes a sense of hope for the future, and
provokes a reflection on the interconnectedness of life. “I believe there is
another world waiting for us.” After watching this poignant film, I will make sure
to read the book in the near future!
Thursday, December 20, 2012
Inception (2010)
Inception is a brilliant film with a unique, mind-boggling plot, filled with intense sequences that would keep you on the edge of your seat. You’ve got to pay close attention if you don’t want to get lost in order to follow the complex layers of dreams. Christopher Nolan tried so hard to ensure that this project remains discreet, now I understand why he went through the trouble. Just one piece of information could spoil the whole story so if you’re planning on seeing it soon, don’t worry I won’t ruin it! Or will I?
Dom Cobbs, portrayed by Leonardo DiCarprio, is the most skilled extractor who knows all the tricks and techniques incorporated in order to extract any secrets from your mind by delving inside your dreams. He’s got one last job, and perhaps the most complicated of all: he must perform inception, which is the act of implanting an idea in a person’s subconscious mind. In addition, this final mission will reunite him with his family, the highly anticipated moment that would wash away all his guilt and regrets of the past. He gathers a team composed of a point man, Arthur (Joseph Gordon-Levitt); an architect, Ariadne (Ellen Page); a forger, Eames; a chemist, Yusuf; and Saito (Ken Watanabe), who will give Cobb what he wants if he completes this mission.
The film duration is 2 ½ hours. You get 50 minutes to adjust to this new, fascinating world until the mission actually begins. This may seem like it’s dragging excessively and is laying too many pipes but the audience is captivated by the extraordinary visuals during the interference of dreams despite the lengthy inception. As soon as you reach the last epic scene, which is approximately the second half of the movie since there are scenes within this scene, you’re entirely engrossed in the film as the minutes tick away. Christopher Nolan brilliantly depicted how every dream within a dream appears slower than the previous dream as he flashes back and forth between the 4 levels. That leaves 4 timers ticking as the team executes inception!
However, Inception has a few flaws. There are several prolonged scenes with Mal (Marion Cotillard) that seem to drag. Also, some of the characters’ lines are not clearly stated so it’s hard to understand what they are saying, which is an issue since that’s what establishes the plot of the whole movie. Cillian Murphy is well casted as Robert Fischer Jr. but his character wasn’t completely developed. First, he appears nearly halfway into the film and at the end it’s hard to recall his purpose in the film!
Overall, I love Inception’s intricate twists and it definitely leaves me pondering at the end. The CGI Effects are phenomenal, ranging from massive buildings bending within enfolding cities to the explosive chaos of crumbling dreams! It must have taken them forever to film the scene of the revolving hotel hallway where Arthur fights projections with only seconds to spare in order to improvise a “kick” simulation.
Han Zimmer, one of my favorite composers, created the soundtracks for this film. It’s absolutely perfect! I’m listening to it as I type! These sophisticated soundtracks doubles the escalating intensity. First comes the delicate violins or strumming of guitars as the action picks up then the brass starts blasting in your ears!
By now you’ve probably realized that this is not for the Die Hard fans, it’s an intellectual psychological thriller. Sure, there are a lot of intense action sequences, but this is one of those movies that make you think deeper. I suggest watching it a second time if you exit the theater mystified.
Monday, December 3, 2012
Looper (2012)
Looper - the most original action
movie in recent years that has its dark moments, bursts of violence, and
dramatic scenes. In year 2074, criminals have developed a system of disposing
their victims, who are sent back in time to be executed by specialized assassins
known as Loopers.
Rian Johnson did an absolutely
terrific job, as the style and stunning visuals are some of this film’s
strongest and most appealing attributes. I love the film’s concept of time
traveling, assassins, and “closing the loop”. The rules of time travel vary
within each film, and in Looper, the future Joe begins to see double vision as
his memories are altered based on the change of events in the past Joe’s life.
When the film provides two different timelines with a glimpse of Joe’s future
life in Shanghai, its montage captures the essence of a life full of crime.
Also, I find it interesting how the idea of telekinesis was incorporated in
this film.
One particular scene with Seth was
truly memorable. Rian Johnson created such a disturbing and frightening scene
with minimal gore. Rather, the music, pacing, and acting paint a gruesome image
in the audience’s mind. In terms of soundtrack, I love the song used in the
trailer because it matches the editing of the action sequences perfectly,
delivering powerful blows and enhancing the futuristic atmosphere.
Joseph Gordon-Levitt, Emily Blunt,
and Bruce Willis were fantastic in portraying their roles. It’s fascinating and
quite convincing how Levitt wore prosthetics to resemble a younger Bruce Willis
and how he imitated Willis’ mannerisms. I feared that the prosthetics would be
unrealistic or distracting, but it was neither.
The first half of the film taking
place in the city was fascinating due to the stylish directing and noir
elements, which were exceptional, but waned off towards the middle. Once Joe
arrives at the farm, the shift in tone seems to result in an entirely different
film with more drama. Ultimately, this is a unique action film with distinctive
elements that draw me into the story as I am introduced to the world of
Loopers.
Monday, November 12, 2012
Skyfall (2012)
Skyfall may have less action, but it is more of a psychological thriller with an ominous, demented villain, brilliantly portrayed by Javier Bardem. Once again, Daniel Craig does an excellent job as the cool, calm, and collected Mr. Bond. In addition, I am delighted to see Ralph Fiennes join the franchise!
The opening sequence with the fabulous soundtrack performed by Adele and dark visuals was well done. Some shots had a Tim Burton feel such as those with cold tombstones, thick fog sifting in the air, and foreboding trees with dead branches. The cinematography was marvelous as well. No shaky shots that may obstruct the flow of the action scenes. Also, the locations were interesting, especially the glass building with bright blue lights and the desolate hills of the film’s finale.
I love the references to previous James Bond films. There was applause from the audience once the Aston Martin makes an appearance! One moment near the end gave me a laugh. Once Silva ordered his men to blow up the Aston Martin, James Bond obviously thought that was uncalled for. No one hurts his dear Aston Martin…No one.
Skyfall’s only flaw is in Javier Bardem’s elaborate scheme, which results in various plot holes. I would think that Silva, being such a cunning rogue agent, could easily kill M. However, he creates cryptic codes, devises his own arrest and escape, and threatens to uncover the identities of numerous MI6 agents just to make a failed and disorganized attempt to shoot M in a full court.
Overall, I still greatly enjoyed this film and how it delved into the past of James Bond. I was satisfied by the fact that the film lasts nearly two and a half hours, taking its time to engross the audience and let the scenes linger on. There was never a slow moment despite the fact that this film had less action scenes than its two predecessors, which had extensive chase and fight sequences. Sam Mendes’ direction was superb, and I eagerly await the next two films with Daniel Craig. Afterwards, who should be cast as the next Mr. Bond?
James Bond will return…
Sunday, July 15, 2012
Dark Knight Rises (2012)
The highly anticipated conclusion to Christopher Nolan’s epic Dark Knight Trilogy certainly lived up to its towering expectations. Each film of the trilogy has a central theme: fear for “Batman Begins”, chaos for “The Dark Knight”, and pain for “The Dark Knight Rises”. Earning around $90 million on the release date, this film is set to make an estimated $160 million this weekend, the second highest weekend gross compared to The Avengers’ $207 million.It has been 8 years since the events in “The Dark Knight”. Meeting his match physically and mentally, Batman comes out of hiding to prevent Bane (Tom Hardy), leader of the League of Shadows, from overthrowing Gotham and taking control of a massive nuclear weapon. Several new characters are introduced such as Selina Kyle a.k.a. Catwoman (Anne Hathaway), John Blake a.k.a. Robin (Joseph Gordon-Levitt), and Miranda Tate (Marion Cotillard). An additional vehicle to the Batmobile was introduced as well: The Bat, an aircraft designed by Fox (Morgan Freeman).
One of my favorite things about this film is the sound track by Hans Zimmer. The deep pounding rhythm of the drums blasting in my ears combined with the fierce chanting of the people of Gotham tremendously intensifies the cinematic experience. Christopher Nolan usually co-writes the scripts for his films and, once again, he was quite secretive about the story, revealing the conclusion to the cast verbally to prevent any leaks. I love that Christopher Nolan provides a darker and more realistic tone to the film, despite the fact that it’s a superhero story.

With a 165-minute duration, I believe they could have spent more time on extending action scenes. Since this massive crowd was assembled for the final fight scene between cops and inmates, the fight sequence could have lasted an extra few minutes. Though, I loved the lingering wide shots of Gotham City’s demise because it allows the audience to absorb the magnitude of the crisis from an outside perspective as it’s being cut off from the rest of the world. They also could have spent time to explain why Bane wears the mask for those who haven’t read the comic books. However, I read that the mask provides him with gas that serves as an anesthetic for a previous injury to alleviate his constant chronic pain, hence the theme of the film.

This film was well casted with most of the actors from Christopher Nolan’s previous film Inception including Marion Cotillard, Michael Caine, Tom Hardy, Joseph Gordon-Levitt, and Cillian Murphy. Each villain of the previous films made an appearance with the exception of The Joker, out of respect to Heath Ledger. Tom Hardy is a brilliant choice for the villain and gained 30 pounds for the role of Bane, a massive, imposing character with immense strength donning a mask and a bulletproof vest. What’s odd is that his voice in the first scene is different than in the rest of the film; though, I find it quite menacing and well done.
Christian Bale will not be reprising his role as Bruce Wayne unless Christopher Nolan approaches him with a script. However, this is unlikely since the director is putting the Dark Knight films behind him to work on other projects. He also co-wrote and will produce “Man of Steel” coming out next summer, which will be directed by Zack Snyder. This is a great team because Christopher Nolan adds depth to the film while Zack Snyder will create stunning action scenes and special effects. I look forward to this Superman reboot, and I encourage you to go see “The Dark Knight Rises” in theaters if you haven’t already!
Tuesday, July 10, 2012
3:10 to Yuma (2007)
Below
is an analysis essay comparing the film 3:10 to Yuma to its
short story by Elmore Leonard.
Transport to Contention
Character-driven stories, in this case, a western, are
particularly fascinating as they resonate with the reader or audience, allowing
them to interpret the reasons behind each character's actions. For this reason, 3:10
to Yuma is unique from other typical westerns featuring horseback
chase sequences, sharpshooters with cigars hanging from their mouths, or
vengeful duels in the glaring sun. Set in 1884, this is a compelling film
released in 2007 with the screenplay written in collaboration by Halsted
Welles, Michael Brandt, and Derek Haas and adapted from Elmore Leonard’s short
story, published in 1953. In both versions, a notorious outlaw arrested for
multiple robberies and murders must be escorted to a train heading to Yuma. In
the short story by Elmore Leonard, outlaw Jim Kidd is led by Deputy Paul
Scallen with a shotgun to the train station, primarily focusing on the tense
finale in the booming town of Contention. On the other hand, director James
Mangold’s adaptation depicts the events leading up to that point as the
struggling rancher Dan Evans involves himself in the arrest of outlaw Ben Wade
in the town of Bisbee, later leading him to the train station in Contention in
order to provide for his family. Although Elmore Leonard’s “3:10 to Yuma” seems
more sensible in the motives behind each character’s actions, the characters
are bland in comparison to those in its adaptation. Therefore, while the deputy
and outlaw stay true to their characters in the short story, its film
adaptation 3:10 to Yuma is superior due to the character
transformations of Dan Evans and Ben Wade.
While both versions are unrealistic in terms of action sequences,
the short story’s character motivations are more realistic. In both cases, it
seems quite improbable that Paul Scallen would survive the final shootout while
being surrounded by Jim Kidd’s gang or that Dan Evans would be able to reach
the train station after facing a town-full of armed men in spite of his
sharpshooter skills and military experience. But action scenes aside, the
characters are more believable in the short story than in 3:10 to Yuma. In
the film adaptation, Evans has nearly every reason to drop the job and return
to his family alive. He recovers his relationship with his son, William, who
now looks up to Evans after witnessing his courageous acts and begs him to come
home. In addition, Ben Wade repeatedly urges Evans to take his money to provide
for his family and restore his farm. However, Evans insists on transporting
Wade on the train to Yuma, even if this requires sacrificing his life. On the
contrary, it makes more sense for deputy Paul Scallen to risk his life for
justice by having Jim Kidd hanged for his numerous crimes. That is his job,
which is shown when Jim Kidd states, “You risk your neck to save my life, now
you’ll risk it again to send me to prison” (32). Paul Scallen is paid to
enforce the law. Furthermore, the fact that Jim Kidd would retain his image as
the villain with no remorse if Scallen were to be killed is more realistic and
expected as he merely respects Scallen for his loyalty to the law and
skillfulness. He has no reason to help Scallen accomplish his job because
neither of them revealed their personal lives to each other as in the film
adaptation and Scallen is perfectly capable, portrayed as a more typical hero
in a western. Compared to the unconventional, yet more entertaining ending of
the film adaptation, “3:10 to Yuma”, Elmore Leonard’s version has more realism,
a prevalent style in most of his work consisting of gritty crime thrillers.
In comparison to Paul Scallen, Dan Evans is a far more fascinating
character due to his transformation and how his values dictate his actions.
Once both characters are on the train to Yuma, Scallen finally smiles and
“suddenly felt closer to [Kidd] than any man he knew” (32). There is simply not
enough backstory or interaction between the two characters behind this vague
statement especially since not much is known about either. As the two men wait
in a hotel room for the train to arrive, Jim Kidd asks, “What made you join the
law,” and Scallen answers, “the money” (28). Both Paul Scallen and Dan Evans
are initially driven by money; however, this is where their motivations
diverge. In the end, Scallen remains primarily concerned with money, asserting
that he, “really earned [his] hundred and a half” (35). While this ending is
interesting and satisfying, it does not result in a large emotional impact as
the film does. Before Scallen steps out onto the streets and confronts Jim
Kidd’s gang, he, “kept asking himself if it was worth it” (32). In the context
of the short story, opening fire on a group of armed men with no backup does
not seem as “worth” the risk as Dan Evans’s more personal reasons for carrying
out the responsibilities of the deputies of Bisbee. What makes the film
substantially more moving is how each character unveils their true character and
inner secrets throughout the journey to Contention. As Ben Wade attempts to
escape, Dan Evans exposes the truth that, "I ain't never been no
hero, Wade. Only battle I seen, we was in retreat. My foot got shot off by one
of my own men. You try telling that story to your boy. See how he looks at you
then." The
fact that Evans would sacrifice his own life to maintain justice even though he
has “no obligation” makes him a more interesting character than Paul Scallen.
This indicates that Evans values honor and justice over his life, and this
sense of right versus wrong drives him to finish his job regardless of the
roadblocks he faces as Charlie Prince assembles Wade’s gang on the streets. In
addition, Evans does not give in to temptations as Wade repeatedly offers him
money for freedom. The fact that the son finally respects his father
demonstrates the impact that the mission had on him. Just after William threatens
to shoot the outlaw, Wade states, “there’s wild in his eyes” and that William
reminds him of himself. If William were still filled with loathing and
desire to follow Ben Wade’s criminal ways, he possibly would shoot Wade at the
conclusion. However, Evans wants to lead William on a respectable path far from
the amoral life of Ben Wade. Thus, Dan Evans is a more profound character and
has a greater impact on the other characters compared to Paul Scallen due to
his transformation throughout the film.
While Jim Kidd resembles the ruthless rebel in the western story,
Ben Wade proves to be far more conniving and murderous with the greatest
character arc in the film. From the beginning, Jim Kidd always underestimates
Paul Scallen. For instance, while the tension builds and Charlie Prince is
about to appear with the gang, Kid urges him to, “Run like hell while you’re
still able” (34). In addition, Jim Kidd does not seem quite as menacing as Ben
Wade. The way that he is portrayed in the short story, Jim Kidd seems just like
a rebellious kid with no chance against Paul Scallen such as when he attempts
to escape, “crawling frantically and coming to his feet when Scallen…grabbed
him by the collar” (35). Ben Wade is charming, yet cold, and does not hesitate
to murder, which is demonstrated in multiple instances. While they are camped
at night in front of a fire, Evans tells his son that, “shooting animals is a
lot different from shooting a man”, but Wade responds, “No, it isn’t. Not in my
opinion.” This also indicates that Wade leads a group of animalistic men with
no sense of morality, especially Charlie Prince. In the film, the two
characters seem to have respect for each other from the start. Wade initially
teased him relentlessly; however, he began to admire Dan’s strong character.
Wade points out all of the wrongdoings of the rest of the lawmen; however, he
respects Dan for being a genuinely good man. Wade and Evans are enemies, yet
they have this camaraderie. For instance, when Evans begins to regard Wade
as a friend, he wants Wade to know that he “ain’t stubborn…for keeping [his]
family on that ranch.” Towards the conclusion, Evans’s remark of being a “hero”
completely turned the plot around as Wade empathizes with him, and even tries
to save his life several times during the chaotic finale. This ten-minute
action scene at the end shows how Ben Wade wants Dan Evans to succeed even if
he is being escorted to prison. Wade admires Evans’s lack of fear to the point
of killing his entire gang in revenge after Charlie Prince shoots Evans. Thus,
the director uses action to progress the relationship between the two main
characters. While Wade’s character changes for the good throughout the film, he
is still Ben Wade the notorious outlaw, as it is implied that he escapes from
Yuma once again, whistling to his horse. This conclusion to a western film is
far more memorable due to the fascinating relationships between the characters
and their transformations.
In the short story, Paul Scallen and Jim Kidd are more typical and
predictable, yet more realistic that the characters in the film adaptation.
However, the reader does not learn much about either character in the short
story. Even though the film adaptation is unrealistic at times, this is
acceptable because of suspension of disbelief, and the execution of the
screenwriters and director, therefore, not detracting from the quality of the
film. 3:10 to Yuma is preferable because the two main
characters are considerably more engrossing characters that relate to the
audience and draw in their attention due to their contrasting and evolving
personalities and attitude towards each other. Furthermore, the film does an
excellent job of integrating themes of justice, values, and honor. Thus, the
film adaptation is essentially superior to the original short story by Elmore
Leonard due to the characterization, motives, and transformation of Dan Evans
and Ben Wade.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)











